This technology description has been taken from a draft. Now this technology has been release in CES 2012.
IEEE 802.11n, the newest draft
specification for Wi-Fi®. It is designed to provide an
overview of the technology, describe new techniques used to achieve greater speed
and range, and identify applications, products, and environments that will
benefit from the
technology.
The growing pervasiveness of Wi-Fi is helping to extend the technology beyond the PC and into consumer electronics applications like Internet telephony, music streaming, gaming, and even photo viewing and in-home video transmission. Personal video recorders and other A/V storage appliances that collect content in one spot for enjoyment around the home are accelerating this trend.
These new uses, as well as the growing
number of conventional WLAN users, increasingly combine to strain
existing Wi-Fi networks. Fortunately, a solution is close at hand.
The industry has come to an agreement on the components that will
make up 802.11n, a new WLAN standard that promises both higher data
rates and increased reliability, and the IEEE standards-setting
body is ironing out the final details. Though the specification is
not expected to be finalized before 2007, the draft is proving to
be reasonably stable as it progresses through the formal IEEE
review process.
In the meantime, hardware that conforms to the 802.11n draft is becoming available, so consumers can begin building high-speed wireless networks
in anticipation of the standard while ensuring interoperability at
high speeds and still supporting their existing WLAN hardware.
The purpose of
this white paper is to explain the impending 802.11n standard and
how it will enable WLANs to support emerging media-rich
applications. The paper will also detail how 802.11n compares
with existing WLAN standards and offer strategies for users
considering higher-bandwidth alternatives.
Wi-Fi® Standards Comparison
The
first WLAN standard to become accepted in the market was
802.11b, which specifies encoding techniques that provide for raw data
rates up to 11 Mbps using a modulation technique called
Complementary Code Keying, or CCK, and also supports
Direct-Sequence Spread Spectrum, or DSSS, from the original 802.11
specification. The 802.11a standard, defined at about the same time
as 802.11b, uses a more efficient transmission method called
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, or OFDM. OFDM, as
implemented in 802.11a, enabled raw data rates up to 54 Mbps.
Despite its higher data rates, 802.11a never caught on as the
successor to 802.11b because it resides on an incompatible radio
frequency band: 5
GHz versus 2.4 GHz for 802.11b.
Note: All of the WLAN standards provide for multiple transmission options, so that the network can drop to lower (albeit easier to maintain) data rates as environmental interference challenges communications. In the most favorable circumstances, 802.11a and 802.11b support data rates up to 54 Mbps and 11 Mbps respectively.)
In June 2003, the IEEE ratified 802.11g, which applied OFDM modulation to the
2.4-GHz band. This combined the best of both worlds: raw data rates up to 54
Mbps on the same radio frequency as the already popular 802.11b. WLAN hardware
built around 802.11g was quickly embraced by consumers and
businesses seeking higher bandwidth. In fact, consumers were so
eager for a higher-performing alternative to 802.11b that
they began buying WLAN client and access-point hardware nearly a year before the standard was finalized.
Today, the vast majority of computer network hardware
shipping supports 802.11g. Increasingly, as technology improves and
it becomes easier and less costly to support both 2.4 GHz
and 5 GHz in the same chipset, dual-band hardware is becoming more commonplace. Much of the WLAN client hardware available today, in fact, supports both 802.11a and 802.11g.
A
similar scenario to the draft 802.11g phenomenon is now unfolding
with 802.11n. The industry came to a substantive agreement with regard
to the features to be included in the high-speed 802.11n standard
in early 2006. And though it will likely be 2007 before the standard
is ratified, the specification is stable enough for draft-n Wi-Fi
cards and routers to already be making their way to store shelves.
Major Components of 802.11n
Feature
|
Definition
|
Specification
Status
|
Better OFDM
|
Supports wider bandwidth & higher code rate to bring maximum data rate to 65 Mbps
|
Mandatory
|
Space- Division Multiplexing
|
Improves performance by parsing data into multiple streams transmitted
through multiple antennas
|
Optional for up to four spatial streams
|
Diversity
|
Exploits the existence of multiple antennas to improve
range and reliability.
Typically employed when the number of antennas on the
receiving end is higher
than
the number
of streams being transmitted.
|
Optional for up to four antennas
|
MIMO Power
Save
|
Limits power consumption penalty of MIMO by utilizing multiple antennas only on
as-needed
basis
|
Required
|
40 MHz
Channels
|
Effectively doubles
data rates by doubling channel width from 20 MHz to 40 MHz
|
Optional
|
Aggregation
|
Improves efficiency by allowing transmission bursts of multiple data
packets between overhead communication
|
Required
|
Reduced Inter-frame Spacing (RIFS)
|
One of several draft-n
features designed to improve efficiency. Provides
a shorter delay between
OFDM transmissions than in
802.11a or g.
|
Required
|
Greenfield
Mode
|
Improves efficiency by eliminating support
for
802.11a/b/g devices in an
all draft-n network
|
Currently optional
|
Primary IEEE 802.11 Specifications
802.11a
|
802.11b
|
802.11g
|
802.11n
|
|
Standard
Approved
|
July 1999
|
July 1999
|
June 2003
|
Not yet ratified
|
Maximum Data
Rate
|
54 Mbps
|
11 Mbps
|
54 Mbps
|
600 Mbps
|
Modulation
|
OFDM
|
DSSS or CCK
|
DSSS or CCK
or OFDM
|
DSSS or CCK or
OFDM
|
RF Band
|
5 GHz
|
2.4 GHz
|
2.4 GHz
|
2.4 GHz or 5 GHz
|
Number of Spatial Streams
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1, 2, 3, or 4
|
Channel Width
|
20 MHz
|
20 MHz
|
20 MHz
|
20 MHz or 40 MHz
|
One
of the most important features in the draft-n specification to
improve mixed- mode performance is aggregation. Rather than sending a
single data frame, the transmitting client bundles several frames
together. Thus, aggregation improves efficiency by restoring the
percentage of time that data is being transmitted over the network,
as
It is much easier for draft-n devices to coexist with 802.11g and 802.11a hardware
because they all use OFDM. Even so, there are features in the
specification that increase efficiency in OFDM-only networks. One
such feature is Reduced Inter- Frame Spacing, or RIFS, which shortens the delay between transmissions.
For
the best possible performance, the draft-n specification provides
for what is called greenfield mode, in which the network
can be set to ignore all earlier standards. It is not clear
at this stage whether greenfield mode will be a mandatory or an
optional feature in the final 802.11n draft, but it is likely to be an option.
Realistically, battery-powered WLAN hardware will continue to be built around
802.11g
and even 802.11b for some time. Despite the improved efficiency
built into the draft-n specification, however, it is difficult to
eliminate all of the obstacles of
802.11b.
This means that consumers looking for the best possible network
performance may want to consider replacing 802.11b WLAN hardware on their networks.
Time To Transfer 30 Mins HD Video
Considerations of WLAN Hardware
Source: BroadCom's White Paper on Draft 802.11n - The Next Generation Wireless Technology.
0 comments:
Post a Comment